Re: META.yml Update Proposal

2003-12-04 Thread Randy W. Sims
On 12/3/2003 10:22 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Randy W. Sims wrote: I've just learned of these groups, and as it seems like an appropriate place to discuss this, I'm forwarding a draft proposal for updates to META.yml here. Some discussion has already taken place on the module-authors and module-bui

Re: META.yml Update Proposal

2003-12-04 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:53:33PM -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote: > Thanks. I've already posted my final proposal to the Module-Build list > for Ken I'm not on the Module::Build list so I missed the discussion up so far, but I f

Re: META.yml Update Proposal

2003-12-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy, I've a question regarding the 'requires' tag. For example, we have Apache::* modules. Some of them can run only under mod_perl 1.0, others only under mod_perl 2.0, and there are those who can run with both generations. The 'requires' tag in your proposal says: I= 1.2, != 1.5, E 2.0>> i

Re: META.yml Update Proposal

2003-12-04 Thread Randy W. Sims
On 12/4/2003 3:50 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Randy, I've a question regarding the 'requires' tag. For example, we have Apache::* modules. Some of them can run only under mod_perl 1.0, others only under mod_perl 2.0, and there are those who can run with both generations. The 'requires' tag in your p