Re: linking to PODs on search.cpan.org (was Re: META.yml Update Proposal)

On 12/9/2003 10:48 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote: Let's say it's named CPAN-META-Specification-1.1.tar.gz. When we link to it, what do we link to: a) the package, L, or b) the pod/html inside the package, L

Re: META.yml Update Proposal

Randy W. Sims wrote: On 12/9/2003 10:48 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote: Let's say it's named CPAN-META-Specification-1.1.tar.gz. When we link to it, what do we link to: a) the package, L, or b) the pod/html inside the package, L

Re: META.yml Update Proposal

On 12/10/2003 8:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Randy W. Sims wrote: 2) There is overlap between the (currently undocumented) 'provides' and the 'no_index' fields. I've reread the arguments on this, and while I agree with Ken that ideally we should specify what is provided rather than what is not, I

Re: META.yml Update Proposal

Randy W. Sims wrote: On 12/10/2003 8:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Randy W. Sims wrote: 2) There is overlap between the (currently undocumented) 'provides' and the 'no_index' fields. I've reread the arguments on this, and while I agree with Ken that ideally we should specify what is provided rathe