Randy W. Sims wrote:
Adam Kennedy wrote:
To give you some more data points, imagine the automated testing
additions applied only on Win32. How would you then specify the deps?
#187 on the TODO list for M::B is to implement the dEx[1] (Dependency
EXpression) language for inserting complicated
Adam Kennedy wrote:
To give you some more data points, imagine the automated testing
additions applied only on Win32. How would you then specify the deps?
#187 on the TODO list for M::B is to implement the dEx[1] (Dependency
EXpression) language for inserting complicated requirements in META.y
There's a few classes of checks we can do.
If the package has a META.yml, it should have a license field. There are
about a dozen legitimate values.
license 'restrictive'
The is an absolute positive match for a disallowed license.
A check covering the above case could safely be added immedia
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Kennedy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the primary goal would be to guarantee survivability for modules
> where the original author can't be found.
I don't think we need to do anything to acheive that. We've already been
handling the situation quite well.
Adam Kennedy wrote:
There's a few classes of checks we can do.
If the package has a META.yml, it should have a license field. There are
about a dozen legitimate values.
license 'restrictive'
The is an absolute positive match for a disallowed license.
A check covering the above case could sa
