Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 20:22:49 -0800, Karen Etheridge > said: > I have been getting blasted with these types of failures again too. e.g.: > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a3e7fbf8-2c2b-11ea-9cc5-910b4c49479c >

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

I have been getting blasted with these types of failures again too. e.g.: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a3e7fbf8-2c2b-11ea-9cc5-910b4c49479c http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a8244f3e-2a0d-11ea-bad3-922c4c49479c Nigel, I'll be honest with you: I automatically ignore every report I

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Nothing. It only happens in your smoker, and every time it looks like something removes all files while smoker is running. Are you sure you're only running one CPAN process at the time? On 2019-12-29 07:07, Nigel Horne wrote: What is different about your package that makes it fail in this

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

It's happening again: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/b78880ce-27da-11ea-a823-10fac181c852 On 2019-10-22 05:05, Nigel Horne wrote: My set up hasn't changed. If it's not working on 31.5 there's something amiss somewhere, but not with my setup. -Nigel On 10/22/19, 5:26 AM,

Possible Typo in Report [was Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

Hi all, this message reads: On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 02:23:17 + CPAN Tester Report Server wrote: > Dear Shlomi Fish, > > Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by > CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours. > > To change your

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Thank you, I given a quick glance to blog posts, not sure if my case can be drawn back to the reported issues explained there. If you notice the imagine below, the output states: /Test::More- broken/ (instead of version number). Could be in this case, the module (or the underlying ones)

Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Hello, I received the notification reported below, it seems that Test::More is broken in one of the test machines. Who is the person I should notify this? Thank you in advance for the help! Anselmo Canfora Original message Dear Anselmo Canfora, Please find below the

Re: Why am I *still* getting test failures for Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

Alexandr Ciornii alexcho...@gmail.com writes: 2013/5/19 Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org: Hi all, due to the many test failures of Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ProgCriticTests-1.131250 I have removed it from PAUSE, but I am still getting test failure reports for it. How can I make them stop?

Re: [do_not_re...@cpantesters.org: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

Richard Jelinek r...@petamem.com writes: Hi, we're having issues with the CPAN Testers report for Lingua::RUS::Number (see below). Test output seems to indicate there are encoding errors (double/tripple encoding) I'm the submitter of the reports. I don't see any indication of encoding

[do_not_re...@cpantesters.org: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

...@cpan.org To: PetaMem peta...@cpan.org From: CPAN Tester Report Server do_not_re...@cpantesters.org Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:43:34 + Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.3.12.170320 Dear PetaMem, Please find

Re: Getting rid of the problem of an overloaded PERL5LIB on Windows [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

On 10/19/2012 06:31 AM, Przemyslaw Wesolek wrote: On 10/19/2012 09:48 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: I keep receiving such erroneous reports from Windows machines, and apparently they are caused by overloaded PERL5LIB variables. The overloaded @INC entries are caused by recursive CPAN calls, where a

Getting rid of the problem of an overloaded PERL5LIB on Windows [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

such erroneous warnings? Regards, Shlomi Fish Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:20:02 + From: CPAN Tester Report Server do_not_re...@cpantesters.org To: Shlomi Fish shlo...@cpan.org Subject: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report Dear Shlomi Fish, Please find below

Re: Getting rid of the problem of an overloaded PERL5LIB on Windows [was Fw: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report]

On 10/19/2012 09:48 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: I keep receiving such erroneous reports from Windows machines, and apparently they are caused by overloaded PERL5LIB variables. Would it be possible to simply load the @INC from a file containing each path per line and populate it in a loop in Perl

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

It think you just say Alien::SVN as your prereq because SVN::Core is actually provided by the Subversion source. Packagers should recognize that Alien::* means external libraries and they'll figure it out. (Or probably have it automated.) -- David On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Dean Hamstead

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

I see the deps properly specified in a distribution built from a github clone, but that doesn't seem to be the same as what's on CPAN. -- David On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Dean Hamstead d...@fragfest.com.au wrote: Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here. For some reason i

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

yes my bad, i have pushed changes to git (using cvs 9-5, i forget to push) previously i listed out SVN::Ra SVN::Client SVN::Core and got this result http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/a81acbac-a73f-11e1-9d6f-f6dbfa7543f5 I then looked on cpan to see what was going on with these three

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Im hoping some charitable soul can help me out here. For some reason i cant seem to get SVN::Core SVN::Client and SVN::Ra to be recognized properly. I have tried listing them as deps and have also now tried listing Alien::SVN as a dep. Feel free to fork and show me what im missing

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

looking at this link and not getting it. Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test? Original Message Subject:        CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27 + From:   CPAN Tester Report Server do_not_re...@cpantesters.org To:     Philip

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

, Jul 23, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Philip Prindeville phil...@cpan.org wrote: Sorry, I'm looking at this link and not getting it. Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test? Original Message Subject:CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

...@cpan.org wrote: Sorry, I'm looking at this link and not getting it. Is the machine in a bogus state that ran this test? Original Message Subject:        CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report Date:   Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:26:27 + From:   CPAN Tester Report Server

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:39:17 -0500, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org said: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote: On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Vick Khera wrote: This distribution has been marked as delete on the module list for quite some time.  

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Daily Summary Report To: Vick Khera vkh...@cpan.org Dear Vick Khera, Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours. To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily Summary, please visit the CPAN

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote: On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Vick Khera wrote: This distribution has been marked as delete on the module list for quite some time.  Why am I still receiving reports about it? Because version 2.05 is still

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Hi folks... While Net::TDMA is not the worlds most fabulous module (and in fact its test coverage is probably less than 1%), all your failures were out of memory. I test at home on a 64-bit Snow Leopard Server Mac with 20gb of ram and untold terabytes of disk. The module is intended to

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Alex J. Avriette a...@cpan.org wrote: I can create a new test, t/00_memory.t or something, to indicate whether this is going to work at all, but the thing is, in order to test an entire TDMA Day, we have to *construct* one. If the user hasn't got the juice,

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Quoting Chris 'BinGOs' Williams, on January 23 2010, 08:06, in Re: CPAN Testers Dai] There was a flaw in my previous logic which I have actually tested this time against EekBoek. Did you use 1.04.06 for testing? 1.04.06.01 has been upgraded to contain M::B 0.32. -- Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On a related topic... I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 . (All Ken's and Eric's) In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 . Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: On a related topic... I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 . (All Ken's and Eric's) In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:35:05AM +, Barbie wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: On a related topic... I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 . (All Ken's and Eric's) In

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:51:34AM +, Barbie wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:35:05AM +, Barbie wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: On a related topic... I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in modules/by-module/Module

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:06:46 +, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk said: but /modules only has: -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1294 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1d.yaml -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 910 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1h.yaml -rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1291 2010-01-25

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:29:41AM +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote: Revision history for Perl extension CPANPLUS::Dist::Build. 0.44 Wed Nov 18 12:37:03 GMT 2009 - Make the prereq resolving fallback to _build/ querying if the 'prereq_data' action fails. Spotted by Johan

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Johan Vromans j...@cpan.org wrote: On a related topic... I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 . (All Ken's and Eric's) In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:15:10PM -0500, David Golden wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said:

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Johan Vromans j...@cpan.org wrote: First is the problem that inc::latest requires a packlist for M::B. I do not have the faintest idea what should go into the packlist. Perl packlists contain absolute file names. What file names should go in the packlist for

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Quoting David Golden, on January 19 2010, 13:15, in Re: CPAN Testers Dai] Johan -- Would you please consider updating the bundled M::B? You might want to see if the instructions in Module::Build::Bundling are sufficient to automate it for you easily. I'd love to say no problem, but in fact I

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Johan Vromans j...@cpan.org wrote: [Quoting David Golden, on January 21 2010, 06:30, in Re: CPAN Testers Dai] It's just the packlist that gets installed with Module::Build.  I.e. by ExtUtils::Packlist.  All this means is that you can't bundle on a Perl that

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Quoting David Golden, on January 21 2010, 06:30, in Re: CPAN Testers Dai] It's just the packlist that gets installed with Module::Build. I.e. by ExtUtils::Packlist. All this means is that you can't bundle on a Perl that came with M::B 0.36+ because there are no packlists for modules

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem. Yes, we're suffering already for

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6656308.html I

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

[Quoting CPAN Tester Report Server, on January 16 2010, 21:13, in CPAN Testers Daily S] Dear Johan Vromans, EekBoek-1.04.06: - alpha-linux / 5.10.0: - FAIL http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/6656308 ... and several more ... All tests fail since some mandatory modules, that

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said: I therefore must assume it's a TESTER problem. Yes, we're suffering already for a few days but today Barbie fixed the testers master database by hiding the broken reports that come from a broken and so far unstopped

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

Hi Abigail, Every now and then, I get a CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report. Now, I guess there could be some value in that, but almost every time I get such a report, it's about a module failing in 5.9.5. The mailer isn't intelligent enough to know what perls it should or shouldn't tell you

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

For what it's worth -- this type of thing has been seen before and from both CPANPLUS and CPAN::Reporter based testers. It's as if two (or more) emails were smashed together into one. Our hypothesis is that there is something happening in the way Net::SMTP talks to certain mail servers. --

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

I was going to send a message to the Net::SMTP author, when I noticed that there are two related reports. Is that any kind of clue? http://groups.google.com/group/perl.cpan.testers/search?group=perl.cpan.testersq=mw487.yahoo.com+%22feb+14%22+mppqt_g=Search+this+group http://tinyurl.com/ctdowu