Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test

2008-12-16 Thread Slaven Rezic
Ken Williams kena...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Slaven Rezic sla...@rezic.de wrote: I was just surprised to find version.pm installed at two locations (arch-dependent and arch-independent), but this seems to be unrelated to the changes in 0.30_01. That sounds weird -

Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test

2008-12-16 Thread Ken Williams
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Slaven Rezic sla...@rezic.de wrote: I was just surprised to find version.pm installed at two locations (arch-dependent and arch-independent), but this seems to be unrelated to the changes in 0.30_01. That sounds weird - do you mean the actual version.pm, or

Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test

2008-12-15 Thread Slaven Rezic
David Golden xda...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:58 AM, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.ukwrote: Hopefully I'll have the time to do all this myself in the few days before Christmas, but I'm sure it would be a good idea for at least one other person to do it. I have it

Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test

2008-12-12 Thread David Cantrell
[Added CC to cpan-testers-discuss] On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 07:25:37PM -0800, Eric Wilhelm wrote: Testers, it would be great if you could run through a sampling of distros out-of-band (to not annoy authors with our alpha bugs.) David, do you have a write-up from the procedure you used on

Re: Module::Build 0.30_01 - please test

2008-12-12 Thread David Golden
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:58 AM, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.ukwrote: Hopefully I'll have the time to do all this myself in the few days before Christmas, but I'm sure it would be a good idea for at least one other person to do it. I have it running now -- though not quite so vanilla a