Here are test reports reporting on failures for these things that
we care about you caring about.
Again, this is CPANTS, not CPAN Testers.
Getting failure reports for a module not running on Perl 5.005 is a test
about something I don't care about. I don't give Shit One if my code
runs on
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:09:56PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
But I've never heard a single complaint about a bogus PASS report
I suspect a lot of that is because authors look at the subject line and
think oh good, my code works on Irix, aren't I clever! and don't
actually read it. I know that
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:09 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fail to understand the mechanism by which CPAN Testers has seemingly removed
the ability of testers to report bugs to the correct places. For example,
I think it's a mistake to set this up as just an author-vs-tester
zero-sum
chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I volunteer as a programmer, but your goals don't automatically
become my goals because you want them to become my goals. They only
become my goals if we reach some sort of contractual arrangement
with mutual consideration, and then only for the scope of
Hi Andy -
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why should I release my software on CPAN if part of the price of entry is
being spammed and told what I should be doing?
Although the remark about CPAN authors' jobs was worded less than
optimally, part of the
Citeren Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
It's not an entitlement, it's a shared goal of making Perl better. If a
maintainer is going to ignore test reports, perhaps its time to add a
co-maintainer.
Yes, something that indicates the age
