On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:13:52AM +0800, imacat wrote:
Oh... sorry. I do not know the cpan-testers-discuss list does not
set the Reply-to: header, and I did not check it. Maybe I shall write
to the list manager some other time.
Here, have a procmail recipe to fix that :-)
:0 fHw
*
On 01/20/2009 12:07 AM, David Westbrook wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
2. Sorry I posted your mail on the list. I do not see any reason why
this mail is off-list.
Your first reply was directly to me, and not to the list (so the list
is
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Proposition:
+ Provide an easy way to execute CPAN::Reporter::Smoker, limited
just to distributions that have any version installed on the system
(instead of all of CPAN).
I still do not see at all.
1.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:13 AM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 01/20/2009 12:07 AM, David Westbrook wrote:
Proposition:
+ Provide an easy way to execute CPAN::Reporter::Smoker, limited
just to distributions that have any version installed on the system
(instead of all of
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:45 PM, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
2. Sorry I posted your mail on the list. I do not see any reason why
this mail is off-list.
Your first reply was directly to me, and not to the list (so the list
is probably missing some context here), which is why i
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, David Westbrook dwestbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposition:
+ Provide an easy way to execute CPAN::Reporter::Smoker, limited
just to distributions that have any version installed on the system
(instead of all of CPAN).
In general I think this is a good
--- Em seg, 19/1/09, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com escreveu:
For additional safety you might want to limit the
installations to
1) Modules that already have N reports in the database
meaning that some other testers have already tested it.
2) Modules that have been on CPAN for at
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com wrote:
Pros:
+ In theory is safer than full smoke, since only testing trusted
distros (and their deps) -- the user trusted the distro enough to
install it in the first place.
For additional safety you might want to limit the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:04 PM, David Westbrook dwestbr...@gmail.comwrote:
(does ::Safer imply a negative connotation towards CPAN::Reporter::Smoker?)
Not one that bothers me. After all, I put this in the C::R::S Pod:
WARNING -- smoke testing is
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:59 PM, David Westbrook dwestbr...@gmail.comwrote:
Whereas you wouldn't want to run a smoker on a regular machine (e.g.
a $work box, or your day-to-day windows desktop, or laptop, etc),
this is reasonably safe since it's only testing distros that you
already
thanks for the comments!
Any suggestions for a good CPAN::Reporter::Smoker::* subclass name?
--david
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:31 PM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:59 PM, David Westbrook dwestbr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whereas you wouldn't want to run a smoker
11 matches
Mail list logo
