Re: root vs user

2011-03-24 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:54:14 -0700, "p...@0ne.us" said: > Hmm, in this report of mine submitted by Bingos ( CPANPLUS ) I see the > UID stuff in it? > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/89d025b8-53ba-11e0-97d8-b656336e7e63 Thank you very much, there's something I have to fix in C

Re: root vs user

2011-03-24 Thread p...@0ne.us
Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:12:37 +0100, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 >> said: >> > > >> it would have been easy to see the root failures but the successes as a > >> regular user. > > That's what >

Re: root vs user

2011-03-24 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:12:37 +0100, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 > said: >> it would have been easy to see the root failures but the successes as a >> regular user. > That's what > is for. Andreas, can you please add a regre

Re: root vs user

2011-03-24 Thread Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯
> it would have been easy to see the root failures but the successes as a > regular user. That's what is for. Andreas, can you please add a regression about $UID/$EUID/$GID/$EGID if that makes sense? signature.asc Description: Th

root vs user

2011-03-24 Thread Uri Guttman
hi, i recently uploaded File::Slurp .14 and was sent some failure reports. i had tested it (or others for me) on a reasonably wide range of platforms with no failures. the report noted netbsd and perl 5.12.3 rcs but also linux and perl 5.10.1. i installed 5.10.1 and it passed my linux. only w