Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?

yeah, I am really not worried about the performance on this one, just noted it for completeness. What is nagging at me is what kentnl mentioned where something nested catches an exception from something that failed to release it's context due to the exception. Not because of these vars, but

Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?

One remaining question. Should the context maintain a stack, where each time context() is called (nested) it pushes the vars to the stack, and each call to release pops it, or should it just store them on creation, do nothing on retrieval, and only restore them on the final release? Right now

Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?

[Top-posted] The extra cost would be: 1. Array storage 2. Push 3. Pop At the cost of supporting any level of nesting, I think it's a negligible cost, but I would profile it. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 07:39, Chad Granum

Re: Should Test2 maintain $! and $@?

On 14 January 2016 at 07:39, Chad Granum wrote: > Right now the version I have up on cpan just stores them on creation, and > restores them on final release. Nothing happens for nested calls to > context()/release(), all my downstream testing shows no breakages (not a > full