I agree.
On Jul 5, 2016 18:43, "Karen Etheridge" wrote:
> There should be -TRIAL releases of anything this far upriver, at the very
> least.
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Sawyer X wrote:
>
>> YAML.pm.
>>
>> It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this
>> group would
There should be -TRIAL releases of anything this far upriver, at the very
least.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Sawyer X wrote:
> YAML.pm.
>
> It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this
> group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to
> non-core toolch
YAML.pm.
It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this
group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to
non-core toolchain tools.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Golden wrote:
> YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain.
>
> On Jul 5, 2016 8:14
YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain.
On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" wrote:
> YAML broke some stuff.
>
> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could
> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the
> module, the more this becomes relevant.
YAML broke some stuff.
I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could
really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the
module, the more this becomes relevant.
Thoughts?
5 matches
Mail list logo