Re: Confirming PAUSE operating model safe harbor for Alt::* distributions

I asked on the private PAUSE admin list for other admins to add their opinion. A couple replied privately on that list or don't subscribe to CPAN workers. I have their permission to repost their comments here: >From Steffen Mueller: > I just read the cpan workers thread. My stance on this was

Re: Confirming PAUSE operating model safe harbor for Alt::* distributions

On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:44:12 +0100, Andreas Koenig wrote: > My reasoning tries to base on previous art first, the letter of the > Pause Operating Model (POM) second, and the intent of the POM third. > Since the intent can only be guessed, we would hope

Re: Confirming PAUSE operating model safe harbor for Alt::* distributions

My reasoning tries to base on previous art first, the letter of the Pause Operating Model (POM) second, and the intent of the POM third. Since the intent can only be guessed, we would hope that we do not need to resort to that. But then there is a fourth thing: reasoning what we as a community