*bump*
This thread has produced very little chatter. Bumping the thread again
after talking to rjbs. Next week he and I are going to talk about next
steps. (Please do not read that as we will talk next week and release, that
is not intended, implied, or expected).
-Chad
I am certainly not going to consider 24 hours of silence a reason to stamp
a stable label on it. Rjbs and I have a status meeting every week, if
things were completely silent for 2 weeks we were going to evaluate the
situation and move on from there.
In addition we still need people from the qa
On 6 February 2016 at 08:14, Chad Granum wrote:
> If there is anything in these
> distributions (Test2 in particular) that makes you uncomfortable, you
> need to speak now.
Mentioning here for visibility:
As with Test-Stream where the apparent silence lead to a premature
On October 29th, 2015, I released Test-Stream as stable. I did this because
I felt it was ready, and because I was no longer receiving any feedback from
perl-qa asking me to change things. Since that release, the feedback picked
up substantially. It seems that declaring something done is the best
4 matches
Mail list logo