Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)

2016-03-02 Thread Chad Granum
*bump* This thread has produced very little chatter. Bumping the thread again after talking to rjbs. Next week he and I are going to talk about next steps. (Please do not read that as we will talk next week and release, that is not intended, implied, or expected). -Chad

Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)

2016-02-06 Thread Chad Granum
I am certainly not going to consider 24 hours of silence a reason to stamp a stable label on it. Rjbs and I have a status meeting every week, if things were completely silent for 2 weeks we were going to evaluate the situation and move on from there. In addition we still need people from the qa

Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)

2016-02-06 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 February 2016 at 08:14, Chad Granum wrote: > If there is anything in these > distributions (Test2 in particular) that makes you uncomfortable, you > need to speak now. Mentioning here for visibility: As with Test-Stream where the apparent silence lead to a premature

Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)

2016-02-05 Thread Chad Granum
On October 29th, 2015, I released Test-Stream as stable. I did this because I felt it was ready, and because I was no longer receiving any feedback from perl-qa asking me to change things. Since that release, the feedback picked up substantially. It seems that declaring something done is the best