On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis
wrote:
> I tried this in several projects, esp. including at $work, and eventually
> abandoned the approach, for basically all the reasons that Kent listed.
>
Since feedback seems to go the other way, I'll unwind these changes and
make "maste
* David Golden [2015-05-19 19:26]:
> I've created "devel" branches for several of the dists I maintain. I'd
> like to leave "master" for things that ship, so that, for example,
> I can ship a stable release after a trial by shipping master.
I tried this in several projects, esp. including at $wor
On 20 May 2015 at 05:24, David Golden wrote:
> Other development work can go live on devel (or topic branches) while we
> wait for TRIAL releases to stabilize.
>
> I think this will be a good practice for the PTG in general.
>
A problem I experience there is "master" is generally the branch peop
I've created "devel" branches for several of the dists I maintain. I'd
like to leave "master" for things that ship, so that, for example, I can
ship a stable release after a trial by shipping master.
Other development work can go live on devel (or topic branches) while we
wait for TRIAL releases
4 matches
Mail list logo
