Given an email I had off-list, I’ll clarify something related to the PR
challenge (PRC):
Through the year I had the occasional email from *authors* whose distributions
had been assigned, and who got a PR that addressed kwalitee fails and nothing
else. They weren’t happy with these PRs.
Recentl
> CPANdeps (http://deps.cpantesters.org) has been providing useful
> information on water quality. It might be enough to make a better or
> opinionated presentation of it for the upriver authors. IMHO META
> files and min version specification depends more on when a
> distribution is released and d
[top-posted]
Further context as someone maintaining distributions with long-running
issues. There are many reasons an issue could stay open for a long time:
* It requires much more consideration (and could relate to multiple
branches of reference implementation or different steps along the way)
*
[top postet]
I agree with all of the reasons and could add even more.
Measuring the take-care of issues automatically would need a
standardization of best practices, e.g.:
- before: need more info, not reproducable, not a bug, wishlist, new feature
- severity: critical, important, normal, minor,
> I think “has a META.yml or META.json” is worth keeping in
I'm surprised this one is being discussed at all. IMO, not having a META
file should disqualify the distribution from being considered at all. At
Berlin last year we talked about making it mandatory, and held off "for
now" so the outliers
I have to agree with that, albeit probably less angry about it. :)
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Karen Etheridge wrote:
> > I think “has a META.yml or META.json” is worth keeping in
>
> I'm surprised this one is being discussed at all. IMO, not having a META
> file should disqualify the distr
2015-12-25 3:00 GMT+09:00 Karen Etheridge :
>> I think “has a META.yml or META.json” is worth keeping in
>
> I'm surprised this one is being discussed at all. IMO, not having a META
> file should disqualify the distribution from being considered at all. At
> Berlin last year we talked about making
I'm mostly surprised at the way-upriver distributions that lack it. I
wonder how many of those are dual-life that don't ship with the kind of
tooling that "CPAN best practice" use.
David
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Kenichi Ishigaki
wrote:
> 2015-12-25 3:00 GMT+09:00 Karen Etheridge :
> >>
8 matches
Mail list logo
