A quick comment on this one, before work begins on implementing it.
This proposal involves the creation of 8+ new dependency types, none
of which have been discussed in detail as far as I can tell.
Pending rigourous analysis of the implications of this proposal, I
think it's fluff. It sounds
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:46 AM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
08. Extensibly Group Prereqs
Proposal:
Rather than have 'config_requires' and 'install_requires' and
'signature_requires' and 'build_recommends', have a two-level system. This
requires a small bit of reworking now, but is
Excerpts from David Golden's message of Fri Oct 09 09:59:22 -0400 2009:
I would like to specify in a usage section what is expected of
downstream parts of the toolchain.
This is probably a good idea for all the proposals.
hdp.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:36 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
Rather than have 'config_requires' and 'install_requires' and
'signature_requires' and 'build_recommends', have a two-level
system. This
requires a small bit of reworking now, but is easy to extend later
without
adding many top-level keys.
4 matches
Mail list logo
