On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak zzb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I've noticed two reactions to this proposal: it is great if it could
be done right and it is currently too difficult. This leads me to
following: how about a lib_requires (or requires_lib) - with identical
-=| David Cantrell, Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 02:03:50PM +0100 |=-
lib
header (this should probably be renamed to inc, with an alias for
sdrawkcab compatibility)
Note that as well as having a library, you need to have the C header
file so you can build stuff against it. Also,
16. Binary Package Dependencies
Proposal:
Add a binary dependency keyword to be optionally resolved by the shell. eg.
binary_requires:
- linux-debian:
libgif4-dev: 4.1.6
- linux-ubuntu:
libgif4-dev: 4.1.6
- linux-redhat:
giflib-devel: 4.1.6
- freebsd-ports:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:49:40]
16. Binary Package Dependencies
No vote, but highly dubious that it could be done in a way we won't
regret
later.
I agree.
Graham.
David Golden wrote:
16. Binary Package Dependencies
If we could get this right, I'd give all my votes for this. I know that
at least Adam and I had been thinking hard about this kind of thing in a
different context a few years back. It's utterly hard to get right if at
all possible.
5 matches
Mail list logo