Re: [C++-sig] [Boost.Python v3] Conversions and Registries

2011-09-19 Thread Holger Brandsmeier
Jim, My answer for 1), 2) for module specific behavior would be that I would probably not use module specific behavior. In my current project I separate the code into multiple BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE. So I would want to use project specific behavior and not behavior specific to the BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE

[C++-sig] [Boost.Python v3] Conversions and Registries

2011-09-19 Thread Jim Bosch
I'd like to restart the discussion on how conversions will work in Boost.Python v3. Here's the starting point: I'd like to see support for static, template-based conversions. These would be defined by [partial-]specializing a traits class, and I tend to think they should only be invoked afte

Re: [C++-sig] [Boost.Python v3] Planning and Logistics

2011-09-19 Thread Jim Bosch
To summarize how I'm approaching this now: - I think the cmake/github Boost repositories look like the right place to put this. - I'm going to spend some time digesting the langbinding and luabind code, and try to put together a skeleton package; when it gets mature enough for others to find

Re: [C++-sig] [Boost.Python v3] Features and Scope

2011-09-19 Thread Dave Abrahams
on Sat Sep 17 2011, Ravi wrote: > On Friday 26 August 2011 16:39:11 Jim Bosch wrote: >> > Well, speaking for myself, mostly time. I'd be inclined to do a rewrite > >> > along the lines of the langbinding ideas if I had time. >> >> I had only been vaguely aware of langbinding until I followed u