Hi Jim,
> > I am a bit unsure about how to work the void-pointers. A viable way
seems
> > to wrap the original
> > API functions with thin wrappers that take a boost::python::object and
hand
> > the "raw" PyObject*
> > into the original function:
> >
>
> I don't see anything wrong with this approa
On 08/15/2011 08:11 AM, Holger Joukl wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to wrap a C++-API that uses void* to pass around arbitrary,
application-specific stuff.
I am a bit unsure about how to work the void-pointers. A viable way seems
to wrap the original
API functions with thin wrappers that take a boost::
Hi,
I'm trying to wrap a C++-API that uses void* to pass around arbitrary,
application-specific stuff.
I am a bit unsure about how to work the void-pointers. A viable way seems
to wrap the original
API functions with thin wrappers that take a boost::python::object and hand
the "raw" PyObject*
in