Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Gustavo Carneiro
2008/12/2 Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2008/12/2 Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > 2008/12/2 Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> 2008/12/2 Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > 2008/12/2 Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > >> >> I would make a co

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
2008/12/2 Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 2008/12/2 Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> 2008/12/2 Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > 2008/12/2 Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> I would make a contribution to some projects. GCC-XML is not one of >> >> them, >>

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Gustavo Carneiro
2008/12/2 Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2008/12/2 Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2008/12/2 Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> I would make a contribution to some projects. GCC-XML is not one of > them, > >> seeing how it's not even worth my effort to try to install and

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
2008/12/2 Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/12/2 Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I would make a contribution to some projects. GCC-XML is not one of them, >> seeing how it's not even worth my effort to try to install and configure >> this stuff. If I were involved with these pack

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Gustavo Carneiro
2008/12/2 Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I would make a contribution to some projects. GCC-XML is not one of them, > seeing how it's not even worth my effort to try to install and configure > this stuff. If I were involved with these packages, I would make it easy > for others to get involved

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Alan Baljeu
look elsewhere. Alan Baljeu - Original Message From: Roman Yakovenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Development of Python/C++ integration Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 10:58:33 AM Subject: Re: [C++-sig] gccxml On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Roman Yakovenko
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is getting out of hand :-( > > All I wanted to do was parse some simple C++ function declarations to > generate a corresponding py-callable wrapper. To do this I need to get > pygccxml. Then I need gccxml to use pygcc

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Alan Baljeu wrote: This is getting out of hand :-( I think I'd rather just do my own thing, except that C++ is so warty it's difficult to come up with anything reasonable that will serve the purpose. How many functions and objects do you want to export, anyway ? I have so far always

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-02 Thread Alan Baljeu
lan Baljeu - Original Message From: Roman Yakovenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Development of Python/C++ integration Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 2:37:46 AM Subject: Re: [C++-sig] gccxml On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm lost ge

Re: [C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-01 Thread Roman Yakovenko
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm lost getting the right gccxml for use with pygccxml. And of course that > would be used in Pybindgen and/or py++. > > The links point to a gccxml page which advertises version 0.6, but docs talk > about versions 0.7 an

[C++-sig] gccxml

2008-12-01 Thread Alan Baljeu
I'm lost getting the right gccxml for use with pygccxml. And of course that would be used in Pybindgen and/or py++. The links point to a gccxml page which advertises version 0.6, but docs talk about versions 0.7 and 0.9. Anyhow, I downloaded 0.6 and didn't have much success. But then I'm not