Alexey Akimov wrote:
Thank you John,
I just installed the tool you suggested and tried to use it. However I
do not see any output. Could you give some more detailes of how the
profiling process with the google-profiler should look like?
What I do is:
1) bjam variant=profile toolset=gcc cxxfl
> The only inconvenience is that I need to start and finish it only being a
> root. This means
> I either have to switch back and forth oftenly or do all profiling (and
> development as a root).
I'm in an environment with relatively few users which I fully trust. To get
around the
inconvenienc
Alexey Akimov wrote:
2) valgrind - also is pretty convenient tool and produces a lot of
information (the raw output loooks quite difficult to understand, but i
guess there is a play around options). It gives you many options of
profiling.
use kcachegrind to inspect the call graph.
__
Thank you John,
I just installed the tool you suggested and tried to use it. However I do
not see any output. Could you give some more detailes of how the profiling
process with the google-profiler should look like?
What I do is:
1) bjam variant=profile toolset=gcc cxxflags=-fno-for-scope
linkfla
Alexey Akimov wrote:
Does anyone know how one may profile a python extention?
I've used the google profiler on Linux successfully in the past. It is
quite straightforward to set up inside an extension.
http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/cpu_profiler.html
John.
__
Thank you, Troy
I'll try the valgrind tool as well (in addition to oprofile).
Best wishes
Alexey
2010/2/28 troy d. straszheim
> Alexey Akimov wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Amos
>> I forget to mention - I am working Linux, so the shark tool probably will
>> not be suitable for me. But anyway thanks fo
Alexey Akimov wrote:
Thank you, Amos
I forget to mention - I am working Linux, so the shark tool probably
will not be suitable for me. But anyway thanks for you reply.
Or this:
valgrind --tool=callgrind mypythonscript.py
kcachegrind
-t
___
Cplusp
Development of Python/C++ integration"
> > Subject: [C++-sig] profiling python extension
> > Message-ID:
> ><382d227f1002271952p25858f1eyeb1c495bd282...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Dear all,
&
> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:52:17 -0600
> From: Alexey Akimov
> To: "Development of Python/C++ integration"
> Subject: [C++-sig] profiling python extension
> Message-ID:
> <382d227f1002271952p25858f1eyeb1c495bd282...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-
][ 0-9][ 0-9][0-9] ' annotated | sort -n
>
> You may need "yum install oprofile" or similar.
>
> --
> *From:* Alexey Akimov
> *To:* Development of Python/C++ integration
> *Sent:* Sat, February 27, 2010 7:52:17 PM
> *Subject:* [C+
ed "yum install oprofile" or similar.
From: Alexey Akimov
To: Development of Python/C++ integration
Sent: Sat, February 27, 2010 7:52:17 PM
Subject: [C++-sig] profiling python extension
Dear all,
Does anyone know how one may profile a python extention? There is a bunc
Dear all,
Does anyone know how one may profile a python extention? There is a bunch of
literature on profiling of pure binaries (programs and even libraries), pure
python code, etc. However the profiling of a python module from python
script seems a tricky procedure.
What I tried is to pass varian
12 matches
Mail list logo
