On 02/12/2012 01:01 PM, VáclavŠmilauer wrote:
Will std::shared_ptr just work also?
I asked this question some time ago here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6568952/c0x-stdshared-ptr-vs-boostshared-ptr
To summarize: you need to define free get_pointer functions for T=your
shared_ptr type an
> Will std::shared_ptr just work also?
I asked this question some time ago here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6568952/c0x-stdshared-ptr-vs-boostshared-ptr
To summarize: you need to define free get_pointer functions for T=your
shared_ptr type and it will work. I eventyallu did not go that way
Jim Bosch wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 11:33 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Will std::shared_ptr just work also?
>
> Just tried the experiment, albeit with slightly old versions.
>
> As of gcc 4.4 (with -std=gnu++0x) and Boost 1.47, it looks like
> Boost.Python doesn't even recognize std::shared_ptr as any
On 02/06/2012 11:33 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Will std::shared_ptr just work also?
Just tried the experiment, albeit with slightly old versions.
As of gcc 4.4 (with -std=gnu++0x) and Boost 1.47, it looks like
Boost.Python doesn't even recognize std::shared_ptr as any kind of smart
pointer, let
