Re: [C++-sig] Boost.Python: Review of Patches

2015-02-12 Thread Huebl, Axel
Stefan, thank you for taking the time, that is fantastic. Did you already take a look at the reports? Thanks, Axel On 03.02.2015 19:25, Ullrich Koethe wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > I've also been waiting for someone to look at my pull request > https://github.com/boostorg/python/pull/8 > (well, I m

Re: [C++-sig] Boost.Python: Review of Patches

2015-02-03 Thread Ullrich Koethe
Hi Stefan, I've also been waiting for someone to look at my pull request https://github.com/boostorg/python/pull/8 (well, I may be too patient). It would be really nice if something would eventually happen. Best regards Ulli Am 02.02.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Stefan Seefeld: Axel, I'm trying to

Re: [C++-sig] Boost.Python: Review of Patches

2015-02-02 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Axel, I'm trying to look into the open patches to see whether I can help shrink the list of open issues. The issues / patches I have seen from you all look minor / sensible, so I hope I can merge them soon. Still trying to get back up-to-speed with the boost build and test processes etc. I'm subs

Re: [C++-sig] Boost.Python: Review of Patches

2015-02-02 Thread Huebl, Axel
Hm, the language binding is dead and 404 http://sourceforge.net/p/boost/mailman/boost-langbinding/ Has anyone an idea about my question? :) Best, Axel On 28.01.2015 15:21, Huebl, Axel wrote: > Oh I just realized > boost-langbinding > > is the better place to report this. > > Sry for cross-p

Re: [C++-sig] Boost.Python: Review of Patches

2015-01-29 Thread Huebl, Axel
Oh I just realized boost-langbinding is the better place to report this. Sry for cross-posting, I will migrate my question there. Best, Axel On 28.01.2015 15:01, Huebl, Axel wrote: > Hi, > > I was directed here from the Boost groups homepage > http://www.boost.org/community/groups.html#cp