Re: [C++-sig] Problems with virtualness and py++

2009-09-22 Thread Pertti Kellomäki
Roman Yakovenko wrote: I hope it is fixed now: http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1759&view=rev A new test case was added. Yes, this fixed it, thanks. I have some more problems but I'll take them to the pygccxml-development list. -- Pertti ___

Re: [C++-sig] Problems with virtualness and py++

2009-09-21 Thread Roman Yakovenko
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Roman Yakovenko wrote: >> There is a small snag still: >> >> virtual_const_bindings.cpp:27: virhe: ”result” declared as reference >> but not initialized >> >> This comes from the following piece of code: >> >>    static boost::python::object default_h( ::B & inst,

Re: [C++-sig] Problems with virtualness and py++

2009-09-21 Thread Roman Yakovenko
2009/9/21 Pertti Kellomäki : > Hi Roman, > >> Can you try revision: >> http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1757&view=rev ? >> >> I believe the bug is fixed and new issues were not introduced :-) > > There is a small snag still: > > virtual_const_bindings.cpp:27: virhe: ”result” declar

Re: [C++-sig] Problems with virtualness and py++

2009-09-20 Thread Pertti Kellomäki
Hi Roman, Can you try revision: http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1757&view=rev ? I believe the bug is fixed and new issues were not introduced :-) There is a small snag still: virtual_const_bindings.cpp:27: virhe: ”result” declared as reference but not initialized This come

Re: [C++-sig] Problems with virtualness and py++

2009-09-19 Thread Roman Yakovenko
> On 9/18/09, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: >> I made some progress with the removing constness issue, >> but now I'm having problems that seem to be related to >> some kind of interaction between virtualness, function >> transformation and return value policies. >> >> The attached .hh and .pypp files i

Re: [C++-sig] Problems with virtualness and py++

2009-09-18 Thread Roman Yakovenko
I will take a look on both problems this evening P.S. I am celebrating new year :-) On 9/18/09, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > I made some progress with the removing constness issue, > but now I'm having problems that seem to be related to > some kind of interaction between virtualness, function > tra