Hi,
I have the following:
class foo : public std::map {
}
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(foo_ext)
{
using namespace boost::python;
class_>("foo");
}
The compiler complains that template arguments 1 and 2 are invalid. I'm
certain my syntax is the problem. Can't anyone shed some light and help me
corr
Jeremy Kie wrote:
Hi,
I have the following:
class foo : public std::map {
}
You lack a semicolon here. (I also don't think it's a good idea to
derive from standard containers, but that is an entirely different subject).
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(foo_ext)
{
using namespace boost::python;
cl
Thanks for the direction Stefan.
Apologies for the typos. What I was missing was the declaration of the
"std::map" prior to my foo declaration. Yes, I agree with you regarding
derivation from standard containers. My portion of the project is written
in python, I'm trying to work with libraries w
Jeremy Kie wrote:
With the addition of the "std::map" declaration, my compiler errors
disappeared.
That is very curious, as Python only discovers whether the base class
has been exported or not at runtime. Thus it can't possibly result in a
compiler error.
Regards,
Stefan
--
I think you are right. I removed the declaration of the std::map and it
compiled without any errors. The problem must have been related to the
missing template types.
regards,
Jeremy
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Jeremy Kie wrote:
>
>>
>> With the addition of the "s
Hello,
The library I am attempting to extend Python to contains a class which
inherits from boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket.
class tcp_client_socket : public boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket {
// class members and functions go here...
};
My question is whether or not it is a good idea to wrap this. My
