At 15:49 -0400 on 5/7/01, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
>If these were the actual words of Tim McVeigh how come he uses the
>British spelling of the following words: organisation, behaviour,
>and centres?
>
>In McVeigh's Own Words:
>
> "For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become
>
At 18:15 -0700 on 4/15/01, Bill Stewart wrote:
>At 05:14 PM 04/15/2001 -0700, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>>At 15:14 -0700 on 4/15/01, Tim May wrote:
>>>* Orson Scott Card, "Ender's Game." Kids using untraceable pseudonyms.
>>
>>Huh? Excellent book but I
At 19:17 -0800 on 3/23/01, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Kevin,
>
>You wrote:
>
>> I disagree. If some judge were to make a
>> ruling that went against the constitution,
>> even if the case law in question was
>> entirely within common law, his ruling
>> would be unconstitutional and thus null
>>
At 23:16 -0600 on 3/21/01, Jim Choate wrote:
>That the one place 'common law' is mentioned in the Constitution it is in
>direct conflict with contemporanious English common law?
That sounds to me like they we're basicly satisfied with the rest of
english common law...
>
At 00:09 -0800 on 3/22/01, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>Jim wrote:
>
>> It comes from 'precede' to 'come first or
>> before' as in importance or scope of coverage
>> (with respect to court authority).
>>
>> The Constitution is clearly superior in
>> authority over any and all courts in America.
>
At 18:53 -0800 on 3/22/01, Bill Stewart wrote:
>Yes, but either the kids didn't say things like
>"I'm going to kill you all" to the class,
>or else they watched the TV News enough to know whether
>it's a bad day to say that sort of thing ()
>
>Or at least they only said it on the playground
At 17:36 -0600 on 3/14/01, Jim Choate wrote:
>Per the 10'th: Where in there (ie Section 2 in particular) does it say
>that ANY court has the job of determining the meaning of the Constitution?
> Section. 2.
> The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,
> aris
At 17:14 -0600 on 3/20/01, Jim Choate wrote:
>Which raises an interesting point, 'defemation' is presented as a 'crime'
>yet it is managed in a 'civil' case, thus denying critical civil liberties
>to the person being acted against.
How is it presented as a crime?
1. You can't go to jail for it.
At 21:07 -0600 on 3/20/01, Jim Choate wrote:
>EXACTLY my point, thank you for recognising it so openly. Now go read the
>Constitution about law, and courts. Who in this country is the ONLY two
>groups that can make law? One is the states through constitutional
>amendments. There's one other and
At 14:35 -1000 on 3/16/01, Reese wrote:
>At 05:45 PM 3/16/01 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
>>
>>In the FBI stats that came out the majority of police officers killed are
>>killed with their own gun? They'd probably been better served by a
>>stun-vest...
It's also worth noting that, that statistic is
10 matches
Mail list logo
