Every station an ISP, 1++ vote
Ray Dillinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
900MHz packet ($100/site) coupled with Plan 9 is the base you want to
start from using current tech. It will require updating firewall software
so that it also handles
Most likely this is out of context over privacy, security, cryptology.
Having the surrogate father pay the bill is as
absurd as having society pay the bill through taxes.
In that case, why not have the surrogate father
receive an allowance from public taxes to raise the child?
David Honig
Just like the legal system,
a cryptosystem holds a key to unravel a
hidden order/disorder.
If you can't read between the lines Sunder,
it reads:
*The Constitution is a false key*
Sunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Choate wrote:
Why is the Constitution not the root precedent?
Clue:
I support your judgement about "Medicalizing" your opponent's arguments with
the belief of having some practical value.
Eric Cordian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An anonymous twit writes:
Anger expressed by commission is usually justified by laudable motives,
e.g. concern for the well-being
What is an AI?
"Daniel J. Boone" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ms. Farr is unquestionably an AI. Please do not feed the Markov chains.
Ooh, but the cute widdle things look so HUNGRY.
Get free email and a permanent
The punishment has been justified but is unjust,
it lacks cognitive coherence.
For all the good deeds taxes are justified to exist,
they are not sustained under close scrutiny;
not the scrutiny under which a court decides over
physical restraint of a "tax evader".
All things being equal, these
Relating how code can infringe on someone else's rights will
be an abstract argument.
When the process of harvesting on "free markets"
is put in judgement, so will the harvest reached
in an economy were an "invisible hand" rules.
Perhaps both should be rightfully analyzed but
which one first?
I agree Danny
***
Danny Yee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lizard wrote:
But if source code is free speech, isn't a judge ordering some code be
removed/edited/changed an intrustion on free speech? Isn't saying
"Remove Explorer from the core install!" the same as saying "Remove
Your last paragraph is a little too complicated for me Jim,
I'm interested in what you have to say but please break it
down for me.
Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Feb 2001, LUIS VILDOSOLA wrote:
Relating how code can infringe on someone else's rights will
be an abstract
We are living a fantasy when we expect the government (who ever/what ever it's
supposed to be) not to dictate our lives when we live in fear of retaliation
for not paying our big brother royalties by way of taxes; not to mention there
are undisclosed means of taxation.
But let's not worry so much
and the human race is not destroyed as
you say by a nuclear furnace, it looks to me the meek will inherit the world.
That is my view and try projecting it without value judgments.
Ray Dillinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Feb 2001, LUIS VILDOSOLA wrote:
But let's not worry so much
11 matches
Mail list logo
