seems someone put AP into action - and it worked quite well, exactly as
jim predicted, and even without crypto (though without rewards either).
see
http://slashdot.org/yro/01/03/28/2130219.shtml
in short: an anti-abortionist website published names and addresses of
doctors who made abortions,
after an initial (only half-serious) idea posted by me to the
dvd-discuss mailing list, someone actually created a program to create
secret keys that result in your public key being a compressed version
of decss.
- Forwarded message from Harold Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 26
"James A. Donald" wrote:
You are full of shit.
what a glorious argument. I withdraw all my comments in light of these
incredible rhetoric powers.
SEVERAL BIZ OPPS IN ONE!
USeeMoreGreen is a FANTASTIC Downline Club
that works very hard for its members.
USMG is FREE to join and has one objective-to
make money for its members!
USMG is currently offering 2 biz opps and when
you join the one called Juice you will be automatically
Ray Dillinger wrote:
Here's an interesting thought, though. There are all kinds of
number generators already hanging in the sky, and some of them
are fairly random, so this thing might actually have a prayer
of working.
that, of course, requires that you trust THOSE. now it is highly
Jim Choate wrote:
While the rest of you folks sit around telling yourself the same old
matra, "It can't be done. It can't be done. It can't be done." We're going
to do it.
please post pictures
Ray Dillinger wrote:
my point exactly. one way or the other you can't TRUST the stream,
therefore it is worthless.
Here's an interesting thought, though. There are all kinds of
number generators already hanging in the sky, and some of them
are fairly random, so this thing might actually
Ken Brown wrote:
The recent bombing of Baghdad fits all 5 of the criteria and involved
explosives, therefore it is a terrorist act under these rules. As Ian
Jackson pointed out (below), the British government itself is not
subject to its own law in this way: but I am. The act also makes it
(receipient list snipped)
Jim Choate wrote:
check back in the archives, early october last year. you'll find an
extensive discussion and several posted algorithms which - while not
perfect - should work well enough, especially in the kind of controlled,
closed environment that the
Jim Choate wrote:
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Only problem is the constraint that GPG must be
specified as the allowed source encryption standard a priori. This was NOT
in the original problem description.
that, of course, depends mostly on what you consider the "original". for
the current FAQ
An Metet wrote:
By GINA KOLATA
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/20/science/20CODE.html?pagewanted=all
essentially, a one-time-pad with a central source of randomness, the key
being the point in the random-number-stream that you start with.
"It's a cute idea, but it's simply
Ray Dillinger wrote:
I don't know if it implements exactly the same protocol, but
SuSE 7.1 (released on the 12th of February, which is an interesting
date considering the timing of the napster ruling) contains something
called "gnapster".
gnapster is a gtk-napster client. I'm pretty sure it
Rachel Willmer wrote:
How can I set up a mailing list or online forum with encrypted traffic?
I don' think there's an out-of-the-box solution for this one so far. if
there is, I'd be very interested in it myself.
one low-tech solution would be using SSL. set up a dedicated machine
that talks
Alan Olsen wrote:
Personally I see the whole unauthorized copying issue as a reaction to the
excesive prices charged for music. Think of it as "market forces" at
work.
exactly. it's not so much that the market has become illegal, it's more
that the legal walls have been moved, and are
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
examples: where I live, making a copy for a friend is LEGAL.
If I'm not entirely mistaken, one part of the legislative efforts this
thread started from is *precisely* to make any personal copying of AV
material illegal.
I haven't read the latest draft of these
Ray Dillinger wrote:
There's a lot to be said for "simple", especially when it would
require invasive (and expensive) monitoring to implement a per-
song download fee.
that is actually one of the main plus points of this, and privacy is one
of the reasons it's been implemented here (germany)
once again I'm asking for some details/help on what looks ever more like
a pure anonymity problem. maybe I should start with revealing what it's
all for, since I'm pretty much stuck there at the moment. point your
browser to http://www.lemuria.org/Black if you want and take a look.
there's not
Ken Brown wrote:
Why doesn't Napster just move offshore?
because it is headed by identifiable individuals.
I'd like to bounce an idea off the list and get some feedback,
especially on what I missed.
say alice has some information, published e.g. on her website. she is
afraid that said information may be a thought crime, aka decss or an
sdmi hack.
bob makes a copy of the information and wants to
Ken Brown wrote:
Don't forget the lawyers accountants. That's the real way to make
money out of crime - work for the criminals in a legitimate job.
not only that. every criminal gives a job to TWO lawyers (or three, if
you want to count the judge in as well).
every law means breadbutter
23 matches
Mail list logo
