At 02:21 PM 4/12/01 -0400, Sunder wrote:
While he can't really enforce what people do with the emails that they
receive from him, if he sees his posts printed in full in the next issue
of WIRED, he could sue.
Quite salient coming after Tim's post about the vulnerability of
centralized,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Greg Newby wrote:
In the real world, you don't even need to sign. Sending a letter
to a newspaper or calling a radio station often implicitly gives
permission to redistribute it in any form. (Ownership might
still be an issue, but IP rights go to the paper or radio
PM
Subject: Re: CDR: Re: Pleading the 5th
Cute, but inaccurate. I never have questioned the ability of list
owners to set their own list policies (I am a member of a number of
mailing lists with do-not-forward policies).
Cypherpunks, on the other hand, is just a little different than a
priva
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
You would have a valid point if the Beasty Boys were in the habit of
sending MP3s of their latest hits to cypherpunks.
What the hell does 'cypherpunks' have to do with it?
Come on, spell it out...
'implied consent'? Where? Who says? You? You
6B99 2DCC
- Original Message -
From: "Declan McCullagh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jim Choate" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: CDR: Re: Pleading the 5th
You would have a valid point if the Beasty Boys were
You would have a valid point if the Beasty Boys were in the habit of
sending MP3s of their latest hits to cypherpunks.
-Declan
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 07:33:37AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Private property != intellecutal property. If anything,
The problem with Choate's argument is that (besides that it's silly),
he gives implied consent to redistribute by posting here. Also, as he claims
to know, CDR is by nature distributed, and each node can set its own
policy. Dont' like it? Don't participate.
-Declan
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
The problem with Choate's argument is that (besides that it's silly),
he gives implied consent to redistribute by posting here. Also, as he claims
to know, CDR is by nature distributed, and each node can set its own
policy. Dont' like it? Don't
At 06:02 PM 4/5/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
I don't do interviews.
I also own the copyright on everything I post to Cypherpunks. If it gets
printed without my permission (and I won't give it) in a newspaper or
other COMMERCIAL venture it is copyright infringement. You're free to post
excerpts.
Amusing. So if I have a cpunx archive, I can't place ads on it?
I welcome your flurry of lawsuits. We already know about your
lawyers on retainer. Perhaps you can forward them come constitutional
amendments.
-Declan
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:13:52PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr
Private property != intellecutal property. If anything, my "private
property" claim is stronger than your IP one, since the bits are on MY
server. :)
-Declan
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:47PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Amusing. So if I have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
