An anonymous twit writes:
Anger expressed by commission is usually justified by laudable motives,
e.g. concern for the well-being of the victim. The expression of the
anger is dictated by the desire to wound while concealing the intention
to wound -- even the existence of the anger. This is
At 05:51 PM 3/12/01 -0800, Eric Cordian wrote:
Can't we do without Victimologist prattle on a cryptography and privacy
list? Shrinks should be next after all the lawyers are fed to the lions.
"Medicalizing" your opponent's argument, instead of responding to it, is a
tactic of police states,
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Eric Cordian wrote:
"Medicalizing" your opponent's argument, instead of responding to it, is a
tactic of police states, religious nuts, controlling relatives, and
idiots.
Which one are you?
Shit, there's a diff?
Sometimes I sits and think, and somtimes I just
I support your judgement about "Medicalizing" your opponent's arguments with
the belief of having some practical value.
Eric Cordian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An anonymous twit writes:
Anger expressed by commission is usually justified by laudable motives,
e.g. concern for the well-being
