Re: Jim Bell Trial: Second Day

2001-04-10 Thread Declan McCullagh
She wasn't a lawyer; your PR clone suspicion is correct. She was not a technologist. Her function was only to testify that an IP address matched an account. Bell's lawyer on cross-examination never raised the point that a message posted to cpunx goes through multiple servers (including the

Re: Jim Bell Trial: Second Day

2001-04-06 Thread Ken Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Second Day: Jim Bell trial [...] The next witness was Hilda Wong Muramoto who is a subpoena manager for @Home Corporation. In direct testimony she stated that Bell had a cable modem account, that the "DNS designation and sub-domain" as well as the IP address

Jim Bell Trial: Second Day

2001-04-05 Thread auto211076
Second Day: Jim Bell trial The second day of the Jim Bell trial opened up with D.A. London making a motion to tell the jury that Bell had owned firearms in the past although he hasn't had any since the 1997 trial. According to London, the fact that Bell had had a gun in the past was a