On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't Jim Choate Prime against this ruling, on the
basis that it discriminates against certain
radiating frequencies?
He has posted to that affect before.
Prime Sinister Jim Choate says:
#
#Bullshit. What I said was that basing a 'search'
#
At 11:25 AM 6/11/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
#``Where, as here, the government uses a device that is not in
#general public use to explore details of the home that would
#previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the
#surveillance is a 'search'
Isn't Jim Choate Prime against this ruling, on the
basis that it discriminates against certain
radiating frequencies?
He has posted to that affect before.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Scotus-Heat-Detector.html
#
#June 11, 2001
#
#Court Rules Against Heat-Sensor Searches
#
#Filed at 11:03 a.m. ET
#
#WASHINGTON (AP) -- Police violate the Constitution if they use
#a heat-sensing device to peer inside
: Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Club Inferno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:30 PM
Subject: SCOTUS rulz! (fwd)
Where did that scum bag Scalia get the 'in general public use' test?
Geez, these guys make it up as they go
