If you're already adept with text analysis you should be able to do the
complementary operation. Make a system that gathers and analyzes
gigabytes of real-world text in order to normalize input text for use
with a nym and broaden the correlation with public writings. As it comes
more into use it
Ray Dillinger wrote:
Wouldn't your own reputation be blinded by a nym anyway?
Nyms are not as hard as most of you seem to assume. Each instance
of a nym's use is more data for traffic analysis, and writing styles
contain "signature" usages that can identify particular writers
with a
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Ray Dillinger wrote:
Give me a few dozen writing samples from each of a hundred known
people, and another writing sample a hundred words long from one
of them under a pseudonym, and I can tell you to a 90% probability
which of the hundred known people wrote it.
Not
It isn't always private - I can remember a about a dozen years back,
there was a bit of a kafuffle over certain Florida counties which had
state-sponsored kosher inspectors. I don't remember what happened,
but suspect they were dropped.
Back when I worked in Manhatten, one of our programmers was
At 08:59 PM 4/16/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
At 02:06 PM 4/15/01 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
regard to contract enforcement. There has to be a hook where someone
who does a ripoff can be punished, or else there is no deal.
In infospace, there is
At 09:12 PM 4/16/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
If the party were truly anonymous there would be no way to identify them
to a third party in order to pass the 'reputation capital' along.
There would have to be a 'persistent nym', not an anonymous one.
Persistent, untraceable nym.
Both.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
At 08:59 PM 4/16/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
At 02:06 PM 4/15/01 -0700, Ray Dillinger wrote:
regard to contract enforcement. There has to be a hook where someone
who does a ripoff can be punished, or
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
Persistent, untraceable nym.
Both.
Untraceables without persistance are useful mostly for email.
Persistent untraceable, that's part of the Realization.
Well, part of it, probably. The point being there are many 'kinds' of
'anonymity'. They are
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:09:38PM -0700, David Honig wrote:
Untraceables without persistance are useful mostly for email.
Persistent untraceable, that's part of the Realization.
Is that part of the Singularity? :)
-Declan
At 08:45 PM 4/17/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
Persistent, untraceable nym.
Both.
Untraceables without persistance are useful mostly for email.
Persistent untraceable, that's part of the Realization.
Well, part of it, probably. The point being
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
The diamond-trading jews of New York use reputation (ostracism from
the community, centrally enforced by a council that rules their voluntary
association) to handle 'arbitration'.
They're also responsible to the same law and license that every other
nday, April 16, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: CDR: RE: Making the Agora Vanish | OSINT distributed haven
(Intellagora)
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
The diamond-trading jews of New York use reputation (ostracism from
the community, centrally enforced by a council that rules their
vol
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Neil Johnson wrote:
I was listening to a radio program on NPR (The cypherpunks favorite statist
medium :) ).
They were discussing the problems with the certification of kosher food.
Evidently there are many different organizations with differing ideas on
what it
13 matches
Mail list logo
