1st Google and now this...http://www.theregus.com/content/4/24421.html
What a shitty week for free speech and encryption.Two dropkicks even tried
to rope profesor rat!
My heart goes out to proff cyborg in canada,proffs have feelings too.See
http://www.theregus.com/content/28/24417.html
If only
choice of law between the laws of men, and the laws of mathematics smack
of some fallacy?
Not hiring a single lawyer, not even _consulting_ (emphasis his) a lawyer,
more truly means you are a complete moron and disdain even calculated risk.
It should be considered that Mr. May perhaps
I might have been mistaken about Tim being CIA,actually with a ring through
his nose,( like the lack of idealogical support he's been getting
lately),he's becoming quite tractable.An ox for the people to ride.
It must be frustrating seeing Jim Bell run off with your Extremely dark
markets,idea
Adam Back writes:
Here's something I wrote up the other night with my thoughts about the
differences between peer-to-peer networks vs the more ambitious
storage surface type propsals and the design criteria which one might
entertain designing against.
http://www.cypherspace.org/p2p/
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Morlock Elloi wrote:
Sharing copyrighted material in order to get the same is the only working
example that I can see. If someone can point to reason why large number of
people would give a fuck about fighting censorship, enhancing privacy and
anonymity,
At 08:33 PM 3/22/02 -0600, Aimee Farr wrote:
Tim wrote:
Don't hire a single lawyer. As soon as even a single lawyer is hired,
you're lost. Because it means you're thinking in terms of using the
legal system, of striking business deals with those whose products
you
napster, and with working
As jim bell twigged and as my dell was taken on one,from now on I'll draw
the blinds and not answer the door on fridays...
Post made yesterday (as comment)at melb Indymedia.
Subject: Soviet style psychiatry.A court case for human rights?
Dr lector or Sigmund Fraud?
Dr perera has been sacked by
You can check that I dont work for the Govt,in fact I cost various Govts
lots of money in the year you've been lurking.
Choate believes in representative democracy and so supports Govt.I am an
anarchist and want to destroy all Govts.
Anarchy al Ackbar.
Lord Hassan [al-Sabbah] preserved his
At 09:26 AM 3/23/2002 +0100, Anonymous wrote:
As far as the economics, one of the main lessons of the failure of Mojo
Nation was that Mojo didn't work, or perhaps you might say it worked too
well. It caused nothing but problems for the operators of the network.
People tried to horde it, they got
eye-opener (the full paper goes into more detail). My conclusion
after reading this (well before also actually, but it re-enforced the
view) is that the safest and simplest thing to do is to just publish
such software anonymously.
Again, motivation.
The number of programmers that would
hi all. Ive been fascinated with the problem of
signal to noise for as long as Ive been dinking
around in internet-cyberspace (now over a decade).
oldtimers may recall that Ive had many various proposals
over the past on the list.
it does seem that cypherpunks has succumbed to
significant
At 02:42 PM 3/23/2002 +, Adam Back wrote:
I just saw Steve Shear's post (copied below) on the dcsb list where he
mentions USENET movie trading in VCD format in alt.binaries.vcd. I
didnt' try any out, but it took my newsreader a fair while to download
and thread the subject lines, and there
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 08:33:00PM -0600, Aimee Farr wrote:
Not hiring a single lawyer, not even _consulting_ (emphasis his) a lawyer,
more truly means you are a complete moron and disdain even calculated risk.
If you break the law by a significant act in that direction, you set your
own hook
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Adam Back wrote:
Are there people who already read cpunks regularly via the web?
(Reading email and mailing-lists via the web always seemed clunky to
me, even on broadband, but there are apparently vast numbers of people
who use only web-email by preference, and to
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Declan McCullagh wrote:
If you are comfortable with your ability to publish code anonymously,
and do this through the methods that have been oft-discussed here,
including chained remailers, perhaps coupled with physical identity-
shielding schemes, there is no need to
Faustine's reply...
Aimee wrote:
What happens if you break the laws of mathematics? Do fractions with guns
chase you? Do you get put in a random number prison?
Well for one, If I broke the laws of mathematics I'd lose time, waste an
incalculable number of other people's man-hours, lose face,
_TAZ_
Everyone go read it now!!
Yes Mr Molnar, Sir!
Please scan, OCR and publish it on the list thru a couple of remailers.
//Mob
On Saturday, March 23, 2002, at 05:31 PM, Graham Lally wrote:
Adam Back wrote:
Apart from my recent comments about NoCeM's and on onspool NoCeM
reader, another perhaps simpler idea would be to do it all with simple
CGI stuff and a web archive. I'm sure this has been discussed before
in
hi guys, thanks for the feedback.
I have in mind a system that would work from
a few factors, with minimal intervention.
I specifically think that a
system of appointed moderators is **not**
an ideal solution for a bazillion reasons.
that is precisely what I have not in mind.
the whole
On Saturday, March 23, 2002, at 05:35 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Declan McCullagh wrote:
If you are comfortable with your ability to publish code anonymously,
and do this through the methods that have been oft-discussed here,
including chained remailers, perhaps
--
On 23 Mar 2002 at 9:26, Anonymous wrote:
Not all of these are still going but it shows that there is a
lot more in the P2P file sharing and publishing world than just
a few moldering old cypherpunk projects from the 90s. P2P has
really passed the cypherpunk world by.
As far as
Aimee Farr wrote:
What happens if you break the laws of mathematics?
You get a black hole.
--
Steve FurlongComputer Condottiere Have GNU, Will Travel
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
22 matches
Mail list logo
