At 11:18 AM 6/1/03 -0400, Ian Grigg wrote:
There is a reason that the AK47 is the weapon of
choice: it is an extraordinarily simple weapon.
Training is probably about half the requirements
of say the M16. That makes a difference, much
more so than, say, the increased accuracy of the
M16!
Got
The assumption that having cracked a cipher leads to can make lots
of money from the break is one held mostly by those who have never
attacked real systems, which have evolved with lots of checks and
balances.
The very best way to make money from cracking ciphers seems to be to
patent the break,
Ken Adelman, the retired gazillionaire who has gained new fame as a
photographer of the California coastline, lives a couple of parcels
from me, perhaps half a kilometer.
For a while now, I'd wondered who owned the heliport that had
helicopters departing and arriving a few times a week
Scott Guthery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I drill down on the many pontifications made by computer
security and cryptography experts all I find is given wisdom. Maybe
the reason that folks roll their own is because as far as they can see
that's what everyone does. Roll your own then whip
URL?
Is it this?
http://snap.bis.doc.gov/
Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not bounce, at least not immediately.
-Declan
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:34:00PM -0700, Anonymous wrote:
I tried to notify the BIS that I was posting some code and I got this
error back:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Brothers
writes:
Any license that you may
believe you acquired with the Software is void, revoked and terminated.
Can you void and/or revoke the GPL?
It doesn't matter if the GPL statement wasn't inserted by the real
owner of the work. Note that the
Scott Guthery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suppose. Just suppose. That you figured out a factoring
algorithm that was polynomial. What would you do? Would
you post it immediately to cypherpunks?Well, OK, maybe
you would but not everyone would. In fact some might
even imagine they could
