That's all nice and good, but why should it be on cypherpunks? Where's
the relevance to this list? Why is Ken, or his addres or helipad an
interest to the cypherpunks? Why is PGE's monopolistic's actions against
him relevant to the topics of this list?
What's next? The Cypherpunk Equirer?
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:00:07AM -0400, Sunder wrote:
| That's all nice and good, but why should it be on cypherpunks? Where's
| the relevance to this list? Why is Ken, or his addres or helipad an
| interest to the cypherpunks? Why is PGE's monopolistic's actions against
| him relevant to the
At 11:00 AM 06/03/2003 -0400, Sunder wrote:
That's all nice and good, but why should it be on cypherpunks? Where's
the relevance to this list? Why is Ken, or his addres or helipad an
interest to the cypherpunks? Why is PGE's monopolistic's actions against
him relevant to the topics of this
- Forwarded message from Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:25:50 -0700
From: Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orig-To: John Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], EKR [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott Guthery
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich Salz
The White House Communications Agency is also working
hard to secure presidential communications, with legacy
systems needing ever-increasing maintenance and upgrades,
the market continuing to outpace the big-ticket legacy
clunker equipment, too expensive to chuck outright, yet having
flaws
- Forwarded message from Paul Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Re: BIS Disk Full
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:50:20 -0700
Thread-Topic: Re: BIS Disk Full
Thread-Index: AcMpAGDW0rLn6AHCQFSmRRWCM9LG7QAkdTWg
From: Paul Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orig-To: Declan
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 11:48 AM, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 11:00 AM 06/03/2003 -0400, Sunder wrote:
That's all nice and good, but why should it be on cypherpunks?
Where's
the relevance to this list? Why is Ken, or his addres or helipad an
interest to the cypherpunks? Why is PGE's
- Forwarded message from Eric Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 01:05:24 +1000
From: Eric Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3)
Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orig-To: [EMAIL
At 05:28 PM 6/3/03 -0700, Tim May wrote:
Possibly for construction
of baseline maps of existing radioisotopes in university labs,
hospitals, and private facilities. Then deviations from baseline maps
could be identified and inspected in more detail with ground-based vans
and black bag ops.
Good
Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's also very much oriented to x.509 and similar certificate/PKI models,
which means it is difficult to use in web of trust (I know this because we
started on the path of adding web of trust and text signing features to x.509
before going back to OpenPGP),
Ian Grigg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric Rescorla wrote:
True, although, that begs the question as
to how they learn. Only by doing, I'd say.
I think one learns a lot more from making
mistakes and building ones own attempt than
following the words of wise.
One learns by *practicing*.
That
At 09:11 AM 6/3/2003, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that SSL use is orders of magnitude higher than that of SSH, with no
change in sight, primarily due to SSL's ease-of-use, I am a bit puzzled by
your assertion that ssh, not SSL, is the only really successful net
At 10:09 AM 6/2/03 -0400, Ian Grigg wrote:
(One doesn't hear much about
crypto phones these days. Was this really a need?)
As a minor aside - most laptops can manage pgpfone using only onboard
hardware these days, either using an integrated modem or (via infrared) a
mobile phone.
Tim Dierks wrote:
At 09:11 AM 6/3/2003, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that SSL use is orders of magnitude higher than that of SSH, with no
change in sight, primarily due to SSL's ease-of-use, I am a bit puzzled by
your assertion that ssh, not SSL, is
14 matches
Mail list logo
