On 24/05/2016:01:59:06 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Yet some issues, but ...
> >
>
> Hi Takahiro,
>
> Here are my general comments on my testing of the v2 patch, followed
> by a few comments in the patch itself.
>
> First, the combination of the new memory
- Original Message -
> >
> > Are you using a mainline kernel (final v4.6, not -rcX)?
>
> Good point. When I configured my arm64 test system, I installed the latest
> Fedora kernel available at the time (4.6.0-0.rc7.git2.1.fc25), but it is based
> upon linux-4.5.tar.xz. I see now that
- Original Message -
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:59:06PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > Yet some issues, but ...
> > >
> >
> > Hi Takahiro,
> >
> > Here are my general comments on my testing of the v2 patch, followed
> > by a few comments in the
- Original Message -
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:35:54AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that PHYS_OFFSET is defined as "memstart_addr", we can get the
> > > > > value
> > > > > if we can access this symbol (on a live
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 01:59:06PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Yet some issues, but ...
> >
>
> Hi Takahiro,
>
> Here are my general comments on my testing of the v2 patch, followed
> by a few comments in the patch itself.
Thank you for your quick
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:35:54AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > > >
> > > > Now that PHYS_OFFSET is defined as "memstart_addr", we can get the
> > > > value
> > > > if we can access this symbol (on a live system).
> > >
> > > When
