Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH v3] arm64: more improvement of bt -f

2016-06-21 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:52:32PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > Dave, > > > > This patch addresses all the issues that I mentioned in [1], and > > re-factored arm64_back_trace_cmd() to make it simpler, while > > arm64_unwind_frame() gets a bit complicated. But those changes, > > I believe, m

Re: [Crash-utility] [PATCH v3] arm64: more improvement of bt -f

2016-06-21 Thread Dave Anderson
- Original Message - > Dave, > > This patch addresses all the issues that I mentioned in [1], and > re-factored arm64_back_trace_cmd() to make it simpler, while > arm64_unwind_frame() gets a bit complicated. But those changes, > I believe, make the code more readable and easily maintaina

[Crash-utility] [PATCH v3] arm64: more improvement of bt -f

2016-06-19 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Dave, This patch addresses all the issues that I mentioned in [1], and re-factored arm64_back_trace_cmd() to make it simpler, while arm64_unwind_frame() gets a bit complicated. But those changes, I believe, make the code more readable and easily maintainable. (The only ugly part is arm64_in_exp_en