Dave Anderson wrote on Fri, Feb 07, 2020:
> > Actually, for do_datatype_addr(), I'm pretty sure we never use the
> > member_offset at all -- I just replaced member_to_datatype() by
> > something that just assigned the member to dm->member and things just
> > work for anything I could try (struct
- Original Message -
> Dave Anderson wrote on Fri, Feb 07, 2020:
> > > Following up with patch, with a couple of remarks:
> > > - I had to change member_to_datatype() to use datatype_info() directly
> > > instead of MEMBER_OFFSET(), to fill dm->member_size. I'm not sure if
> > > this
Dave Anderson wrote on Fri, Feb 07, 2020:
> > Following up with patch, with a couple of remarks:
> > - I had to change member_to_datatype() to use datatype_info() directly
> > instead of MEMBER_OFFSET(), to fill dm->member_size. I'm not sure if
> > this will have any side effects, but things like
- Original Message -
> Dave Anderson wrote on Thu, Feb 06, 2020:
> > Right, the time-consumer is the call into gdb to get the structure member
> > details.
> >
> > I'm not following what you mean by "making 'datatype_member' static ...",
> > but
> > off the top of my head, I was
Dave Anderson wrote on Thu, Feb 06, 2020:
> Right, the time-consumer is the call into gdb to get the structure member
> details.
>
> I'm not following what you mean by "making 'datatype_member' static ...", but
> off the top of my head, I was thinking of adding a "tmp_offset" and "tmp_size"
>
- Original Message -
> Dave Anderson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2020:
> > > What might make sense is to use the "struct -r" option, which does a raw
> > > memory dump of a data structure. But for a reason I do not recall, it
> > > prevents that option from being used with a
Dave Anderson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2020:
> > What might make sense is to use the "struct -r" option, which does a raw
> > memory dump of a data structure. But for a reason I do not recall, it
> > prevents that option from being used with a "struct_name.field" argument.
> > (see line 6628 of
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi,
> >
> > I often find myself dumping a bunch of addresses to files to iterate
> > with 'struct_name.field < file_with_addresses', but that is horribly
> > slow for large number of iterations.
> >
> > `help list` comment
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> I often find myself dumping a bunch of addresses to files to iterate
> with 'struct_name.field < file_with_addresses', but that is horribly
> slow for large number of iterations.
>
> `help list` comment for -S vs. -s made me try to use `rd` instead,
>
Hi,
I often find myself dumping a bunch of addresses to files to iterate
with 'struct_name.field < file_with_addresses', but that is horribly
slow for large number of iterations.
`help list` comment for -S vs. -s made me try to use `rd` instead,
e.g. get offset manually from `struct -o` then use
10 matches
Mail list logo
