- Original Message -
> Hi Dave,
>
> I build the proccgroup extensions on
> https://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/proccgroup.c.
> and find a bug on centos 7. the following patch fix it.
Normally the owner/maintainer listed is responsible to accept any
changes to their module. But since it's an obvious fix, I have gone
ahead and updated https://people.redhat.com/anderson/extensions/proccgroup.c
and I've cc'd the owner/maintainer.
> I also want to ask another question:
> Why not put various extensions in the extensions directory of the source code?
Because that would imply some expectation of ongoing support, and I am
absolutely not
interested in doing that.
Thanks,
Dave
>
> Wang Long (1):
> extensions: proccgroup: fix the wrong method which detect whether to
> support getting subsys name
>
> extensions/proccgroup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
>
--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
