On 3/19/2018 7:34 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
Thank you Martin for the addition to the scope note regarding P2.
Just to clarify, the easiest way to refer to a relationship defined by
the CRM is via the URI of that relationship.
Thus I assume it is okay to do this:
_:aa a
Thank you Martin for the addition to the scope note regarding P2.
Just to clarify, the easiest way to refer to a relationship defined by the CRM
is via the URI of that relationship.
Thus I assume it is okay to do this:
_:aa a E13_Attribute_Assignment ;
P2_has_type ;
P141_assigned ;