Dear Martin,
My "recommendation" was just putting into question an aspect of
Florian's suggestion, and not meant to replace it in a final way.
Regarding your points: The practical cases I am familiar with would use
the E13 on the whole triple, i.e. the link/property-type including a
specific
Dear Maximilian,
This makes sense to me, but I do not agree with your recommendation as a
general rule.
There is a fundamental epistemological problem, which has nothing to do
with quantitative evidence. The latter,
by the way, cannot detect an endless recursion anyhow, because people
would
Perfect!
Martin
On 3/24/2018 9:47 AM, Øyvind Eide wrote:
Am 23.03.2018 um 20:26 schrieb Martin Doerr :
Dear Florian,
This is what I meant by "in general".
I propose to reformulate:
Therefore the use of E13 Attribute Assignment marks the fact, that the
maintaining team is either neutral to
Dear Florian and all,
Based on quantitative evidence, I'd object to the following to part of your
suggestion:
"This fact must not individually be registered for all instances of properties
provided by the maintaining team, because it*/would result in an endless recursion/* of
whose opinion w
> Am 23.03.2018 um 20:26 schrieb Martin Doerr :
>
> Dear Florian,
>
> This is what I meant by "in general".
>
> I propose to reformulate:
>
> Therefore the use of E13 Attribute Assignment marks the fact, that the
> maintaining team is either neutral to the validity of the respective
> asser
