Dear Stephen, George, all,
To make sure that we’re on the same page, if Rights are to be treated as
concepts rather than the legal application of the concept, then I can conceive
of the Right that I personally own Van Gogh’s “Irises”. Not even that I am
claiming to own the painting, just
Hiya George
First
Using our basic principles:-
a] if we don't understand/know something model it as loosely as possible (or
not at all!)
b] model based on actual data structures and schema
I suspect that there are many different types of Right that exist regardless of
recognition and others that
Hir Steve!
I can see the logic of that solution. First, that seems like an elegant
solution which does not require adding properties.
Some quandaries though, for discussion. When we speak of the right of
‘ownership’ for example over x, do we speak of the one unique right of
ownership that can
Dear Rob, George and all,
George is absolutely correct that the right is the conceptual object of the
right itself regardless of whether it is current or not. I do not agree that we
need some new link from the right to time. The simple construct is to use an E7
Activity that uses a specific
Dear Rob et al.,
I would say that the modelling of conceptual object and its begin/end relation
is correct also in this instance. It is not the existence of the right qua
concept that terminates when the right over something expires. I would argue
that the right can exist before it comes into
Dear all,
I would prefer Heraklion as meeting venue which makes at least my life much
easier.
Best Siegfried
_
From: Christian-Emil Smith Ore
mailto:c.e.s@iln.uio.no>>
Sent: Montag, August 14, 2017 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Venue next meeting Oct. 9-12,
Dear all,
We are looking to express a Right that applies to an Object, such as Ownership.
As the Right only applies for a limited duration, we had though to create the
Right as part of the Acquisition of the Object and then to have it be taken out
of existence by the subsequent Acquisition.
