Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Exchange Activity proposal

Dear Robert, On 6/15/2019 3:57 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: I have some questions about ongoing beliefs in Inf and especially Activity Plans in Soc with regard to the restriction to modeling historical reality, as opposed to planned behavior. It seems that at least Activity Plan and Trigger

Re: [Crm-sig] SOC: Proposal to remove Provision and replace with Activity

Dear Robert, all, Let me make some clarifications. I propose a class provision with the scope note I have provided. I propose to model *bottom-up*, and the general scope I consider is what we call business between well-defined parties. Your list of activities well-taken:-), I would rather

Re: [Crm-sig] Reuse identifiers of obsolete entities never published

I also support there not being reuse of numbers. There is no end of numbers to choose from. Best, George -- Dr. George Bruseker Coordinator Centre for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology

[Crm-sig] 44th CRM SIG & 37th CRM - FRBR Harmonization Meeting - Thanks

Dear all, Returning back to base after a constructive week together, I wanted to especially reiterate thanks to: - Melanie Roche and the BNF for hosting - Chryssoula Bekiari and Eleni Tsoulouha for organizing the issue tracking and documentation before, during and post meeting - Everyone who