It seems to make sense to raise as an issue. The case does seem to come up
reasonably frequently. The parallel seems convincing. For the moment we could
cover temporal elements by initiating the existing of the property via an E13
attribute assignment (if we had such info).
> On Feb 15,
Dear George,
I think I have been thoroughly misunderstood. I have repeated here a
basic principle we have commonly adopted from the very beginning of the
CRM. I am slightly upset, that I have been interpreted to willfully
declare queries unimportant of a domain that is not mine, and that you
I have the same intuition on this. It is a similar line to the language
question. If people document it and use it, then it does not seem to be the
role of the SIG to say that it is not interesting for documentation or
integration. Surely it is the specialists who know this, and the conceptual
