Dear George, all
“during” sounds fine.
In my opinion, not because “at” is locative and implies a place, which is not
true: see e.g. "at present", "at midnight", "at some point in time". But
because it implies precision, an exact point in time, at the time granularity
level assumed, so that
Hi all,
Would object_encountered_at_event be too long ?
Best,
Pierre
On Fri, Oct 22nd, 2021 at 3:28 PM, Eleni Tsoulouha via Crm-sig
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
>
> Not that i m 100% confident concerning my intuitions for English, but I
> think that *during* is more suited for
Hi all,
Not that i m 100% confident concerning my intuitions for English, but I
think that *during* is more suited for relations btw temporal entities
(where the one serves as a temporal frame of sorts for the other) OR for
relations btw temporal entities and their location-times (aka
+1 to changing it from at, which definitely implies location.
object_encountered_during seems good to me, thank you Melanie!
Rob
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:38 AM melanie.roche--- via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> Dear George,
>
> I share your concerns. Being unfamiliar with CRMsci
It is true it is linked to the Encounter Event, so, native speaker can find a
better phrase for this
Brs
Athina
October 22, 2021 3:21 PM, "melanie.roche--- via Crm-sig" mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr?to=%22melanie.roche---%20via%20Crm-sig%22%20)>
wrote:
Dear George,
I share your concerns. Being
Dear George,
I share your concerns. Being unfamiliar with CRMsci in general and O19 in
particular, when I first read your mesage I immediately assumed that the
inverse property pointed to a place. As a non-native English speaker, I
agree that there is a very strong locative flavour to the
Dear all,
I am manually correcting some ontology files (horror) and changing the
nomenclature from the previous names for O19 which were:
has found object
(was object found by)
up until version 1.2.6 of the document.
Then it changed, rightly (mostly), to:
encountered object
was object
