Dear all,
The deadline for voting on this issue has passed. There were 5 votes in
total. 5 votes were to approve the change. 0 votes were against. Therefore,
it would appear the change passes.
This will be reported to the CRM SIG in the session on the CRMdig which
will be held next week in
Dear all,
The deadline for voting on this issue has passed. There were 7 votes in
total. 7 votes were to approve the change. 0 votes were against. Therefore,
it would appear the change passes.
This will be reported to the CRM SIG in the session on the CRMdig which
will be held next week in
Dear Thanasis
Yes,it is about Issue 610, but it is also an epistemological background
for an interface to CRMinf (Issue 609), where we would need to study how
such arguments can be documented.
Best,
Martin
On 11/24/2022 3:17 PM, Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig wrote:
Thank you for this
OK, ,
If I understand correctly, the "w" should just be propagated in both
directions. If P125, nothing tells us that the unknown z is the same as
one possibly in a full path of the same activity. Nothing tells us why
there should not be more than one "w" for the same z. Is that what you
Dear Christian-Emil, all,
I think we need to distinguish KB and ontology. Right now, it appears to
me that
P50 has current keeper, P52 has current owner, P55 has current location'
are knowledge base constructs, whereas our FOLs are ontological per
definitionem. I believe the better order of
B:
Typo: P125 should be P125.1 in the bold phrase.
"The implication from the long path to the shortcut is ok since the shortcut
has no .1-property. The implication from the shortcut to the long path is
problematic since there is a .1-property in the long path. It is possible to
imagine that
Better reference to the passion flowers:
Dear Christian-Emil,
I agree with your precise analysis, except for:
A) I'd argue that P138.1 mode of representation is indeed identical to
P62.1. Simply, similar examples have not been provided. I suggest a FOL
for that.
"P138.1 mode of representation seems to be unrelated to P62.1
Dear all,
In an email exchange we have discussed the term 'weak inverse shortcut'
introduced in Meghini & Doerr. The conclusion is that the term is problematic
and Martin redefined it as
' an instance of the shortcut property implies an instance of each of the
properties and classes in the
Dear all,
My HW can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kd-zCO8e00WoKWb-9VAm96ECDEA2O_1iFI6kpgcuCnE
Best,
Christian-Emil
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
10 matches
Mail list logo
