Re: [Crm-sig] Describing Exhibitions ?

2020-03-09 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello Thank you, this is clear and helpful. I can distinguish the Exhibition as an Activity vs. the set of items being exhibited. The set of items being exhibited is not an E78_Collection. The set of items can be described as a Physical Man-Made Object, with sub-components, and part additions and

Re: [Crm-sig] Describing Exhibitions ?

2020-03-08 Thread Martin Doerr
Dear All, May be I can make the difference more clear: The fundamental principle of formal ontologies is to be able to say if something is the same thing in two different references. Therefore, (1) the identity of the exhibition set is given by what was exhibited. The phase of collecting

Re: [Crm-sig] Describing Exhibitions ?

2020-03-07 Thread Martin Doerr
Dear Thomas, Just to clarify: Any fixed set of objects kept together for a particular purpose in this combination qualifies as a kind of Physical Object, and is not regarded "Collection" only because it is a set of things. A collection in the sense of E78 is given when things are potentially

Re: [Crm-sig] Describing Exhibitions ?

2020-03-06 Thread George Bruseker
You might want to hop over to the Linked.Art forum and check out what is going on. It is the major focus of modelling right now (using CRM). It is not finalized but you can at least follow the live discussions and make your own decisions. Best, George On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:36 PM Thomas

[Crm-sig] Describing Exhibitions ?

2020-03-06 Thread Thomas Francart
Hello Has anyone already described Exhibitions using the CIDOC-CRM ? I have a use-case where we thought it could make sense to publish/disseminate data about exhibitions, mostly to state the list of objects in the museum that "participated in" the exhibition. Can the group of items that