I'm currently unable to access https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/. I
just get a neverending Loading... message in my browser tab.
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/hudson.eclipse.org reports that
the server itself is up, so either Hudson is hosed or it really is just
me. Are other people
Thanks for the quick response, Markus.. It was a problem on our end.
It's been fixed and I can now also login.
- Zeb
On 28.02.2012 11:15, Markus Knauer wrote:
Yep, I am able to connect to Hudson and to login without problems.
Markus
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:06, Zeb Ford-Reitz
Hey folks. There are a lot of opportunities to get together and talk
about builds at EclipseCon.
There are a handful of talks [1]. I'm particularly excited about
"How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Build" [2]. In this
talk, Webmaster Denis and I are going
Compiled 2012-02-28T12:07
build.eclipse.org
- Usage exceeding 1GB for: Hudson master jobs and workspace (2012-02-28T10:00)
17.9G eclipse-equinox-test-N
3.8G cbi-scout-3.7
3.0G cbi-pdt-3.0-indigo
2.9G cbi-pdt-2.2-helios
2.1G emf-cdo-integration
2.1G Xtext-nightly-HEAD
Hi Folks,
I know it's short notice but as it's quiet for Hudson this week I'm
going to move us off the Winstone servlet and onto Jetty. I've got
everything ready to go so at 4pm I'll shut Hudson down and then startup
the Jetty instance. I expect we'll be offline for about 10 minutes.
On 2/28/12 11:42 AM, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:
Hi Folks,
I know it's short notice but as it's quiet for Hudson this week I'm
going to move us off the Winstone servlet and onto Jetty. I've got
everything ready to go so at 4pm I'll shut Hudson down and then
startup the Jetty instance. I
not sure what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' really
maybe osgi vs normal distribution? or embedded vs normal distribution?
in those cases there shouldn't be any real default difference, osgi
has its natural bit of classloader muckity muck muck but in terms of
processing of a request from
Hi,
1.1G rap-runtime
I keep getting the very same result here even though I already reduced
the number of builds to keep some time ago. A `du -hs
/shared/jobs/rap-runtime/` gives me 682M. Can anyone explain this
difference?
Regards, Ralf
___
ok...for the record...
if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
immediately jetty's fault.
thank you for listening :)
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:17, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
Yeah, nice try, buddy.
Man, is it just me, or has Hudson been soo slw for the last
6 minutes?
:-D
On 02/28/2012 04:25 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
ok...for the record...
if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
immediately jetty's fault.
thank you for
The disk calculations were being run on Thursday, and the report was
being send on Tuesday.
I thought that was quite funny.
So now the calculations start at 4pm Tuesday and the report is sent on
Wednesday morning. That means we'll get the exact same report tomorrow
-- let's just ignore it.
feels pretty snappy at the moment
looks like this was a good move :-)
--
Matthias
2012/2/28 Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org
Yeah, nice try, buddy.
Man, is it just me, or has Hudson been soo slw for the last
6 minutes?
:-D
On 02/28/2012 04:25 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
Hi Tom,
I only need updates for CQs that are not currently in a FIXED state.
Thanks!
Janet
-Original Message-
From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:58 PM
13 matches
Mail list logo
