Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new Recommended Orbit repo for Juno SR2

2013-01-29 Thread David M Williams
It is too late for SR2, for several reasons, but a great suggestion for Kepler, if the TM project (or others) want it. Just to briefly outline the reasons, we are already up to RC2 and RC3, so I think it'd have to be a blocking problem to cause all that stress, and it doesn't sound like a

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new Recommended Orbit repo for Juno SR2

2013-01-29 Thread David Dykstal
Right now our master branch is still being using for Juno maintenance. We'll put this into our Kepler builds when 1) we create our Juno maintenance branch off the master (probably on Feb 25) and 2) the CQ is approved. The earliest Kepler build that you'll see it would be Kepler M6. -- Dave

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Heads up ... new Recommended Orbit repo for Juno SR2

2013-01-29 Thread Wayne Beaton
Thanks for the reminder, David. I've asked Janet about the date and will announce what she decides when I hear back. Wayne On 01/29/2013 03:17 AM, David M Williams wrote: And, Kepler is not that far away. I don't recall seeing the

[cross-project-issues-dev] Juno SR2 aggregation

2013-01-29 Thread Greg Watson
Sorry if this is another dumb question. The result of the Juno aggregation goes to releases/maintenance, right? The reason that I ask is that the console log appears to indicate that the last build aggregated PTP 6.0.4.201301291850, however when I look in releases/maintenance, all I see is

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Juno SR2 aggregation

2013-01-29 Thread David M Williams
Check now. The final step to get into .../releases/maintenance depends on me running a manual job, and I was 3 days behind. (but just now promoted). I'll get that automated one of these years. :/ Thanks, From: Greg Watson g.wat...@computer.org To: Cross project issues