- Original Message -
> From: "Konstantin Komissarchik"
> To: "Cross project issues"
> Sent: Monday, 14 September, 2015 5:25:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Unannounced Changes Have
>
The TableTreeViewer and related classes are now "back in" build
I20150914-2000 . For those effected by it's removal, please verify
quickly all is well when using that 0914-2000 build. I say "quickly" since
we are producing our Neon M2 build this week (Wednesday) so want to be
sure nothing was
- Original Message -
> From: "David M Williams"
> To: "Cross project issues"
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 September, 2015 12:42:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] TableTreeViewer removed -- now is
> back (in
And an insult to all the members of the community who are working their asses
off on their own projects many of them on their own time as well, who would
love to help the platform but who also need sleep and to acquaint themselves
with their families once in a while.
At any rate, I’m OK if the
I've quickly re-upgraded my TP and tested. I can confirm that the fatal problem
is now gone. Thank you!
Cheers
/Eike
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Am 15.09.2015 um 11:42 schrieb David M Williams:
The TableTreeViewer and related
FYI - the planned removal of org.eclipse.jface.util.ListenerList,
TableTree and TableTreeViewer was incorrected stated for June 2015 in
the API removal document.
http://help.eclipse.org/mars/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.platform.doc.isv%2Fporting%2Fremovals.html
This has been corrected to June
Doug,
My goal was not to insult anyone. I just wanted to cheer up a little bit
the Platform committers.
I hope you can look at this with different eyes and see another perspective.
Peace,
Kaloyan
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> And an insult to all
I like the idea of 5.0 for API removal. To minimize impact on adopters:
why not schedule the jump to 5.0 for Neon+1 as to give projects a chance
to include more removal of deprecated API at once? I believe the currently
discussed API removal could easily wait until Neon+1? Then API cleanup
would
Hi,
I could not resist to share this photo. A salute to the platform committers
for keeping the platform relevant.
Greetings,
Kaloyan
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Konstantin Komissarchik"